It is universally acknowledged that the UK has a housing crisis. But the whole trajectory of Conservative thinking on housing and planning is towards home ownership and away from “affordable” housing built by councils and housing associations.
The government’s current housing plans propose spending £42.7bn on a raft of home ownership initiatives and only £2bn on social and affordable homes. This balance should be reversed – it is time to invest in social housing.
Pumping in money to increase demand without addressing structural supply issues is foolhardy. It simply pushes up prices and makes buying an ever more distant prospect for millions. Is it any surprise that home ownership is at its lowest level for 30 years? Continue reading
The social housing sector is a bit like the Labour party – deeply divided, although not quite so nasty.
On the one side are the pragmatists, those prepared to go with the flow and do the government’s bidding, with its trajectory towards home ownership. Some in this group see a bright future in a more commercial environment, where they build homes for sale and private rent. A tiny few look forward to a future where they can break free from the shackles of state control and become fully private companies. Continue reading
According to Housing Minister Gavin Barwell the new Neighbourhood Planning Bill will “…help speed up delivery of the further new homes our country needs and ensure our foot is still firmly on the pedal.”
Unfortunately, the evidence suggests that the opposite is the case. Not only are Neighbourhood Plans tending to inhibit rather than promote development, they also favour well-heeled areas over poorer areas and have, in many cases, pre-empted and by-passed the Local Plan process.
Since their introduction in the Localism Act 2011 almost two thousand Neighbourhood Plans have been put in place across the country and there is no doubt that they have released an untapped enthusiasm for community engagement in the planning process. But a 2014 study by Turley planning consultants found that over half of published plans were designed solely to resist development, and that 73 percent were in areas with Conservative councils, and just 9 percent in Labour areas. Continue reading
Housing and politics go together like Cannon and Ball or Gavin and Stacey. Like it or not, you cannot take politics out of housing. To paraphrase Trotsky, you may not like politics, but politics likes you. Housing has been a political football since at least 1900 and even during the fragile political consensus of the post-war years you only have to read Hansard to realise that there were fierce political arguments about housing policy. That consensus ended, of course, on the 3rd May 1979 when ideology took over – home ownership good, social housing bad – and endured for 18 years. The last Labour government did some great things in housing, and John Healey was the best housing minister of the last twenty years by a country mile, but Labour failed to boost supply and to unpick the Right to Buy. Since last year’s election, ideology is back at full throttle, with home ownership now the only game in town. Regular readers of Inside Housing will know that this is doomed to fail. Continue reading